<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SCHOOL ORGANISATIONAL VARIABLES AND EDUCATION QUALITY  PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AT SENIOR SECONDARY LEVEL IN  SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1569</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 22:51:39 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T22:51:39Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>SCHOOL ORGANISATIONAL VARIABLES AND EDUCATION QUALITY  PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AT SENIOR SECONDARY LEVEL IN  SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1570</link>
<description>SCHOOL ORGANISATIONAL VARIABLES AND EDUCATION QUALITY  PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AT SENIOR SECONDARY LEVEL IN  SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA
AKANNI, HAFSAT OMOTOLA
There are evidence of poor indicators (teacher effectiveness, students non-cognitive outcomes, &#13;
students achievement in English Language and Mathematics) of educational quality performance &#13;
in most secondary schools in southwestern Nigeria. This problem has been attributed to school &#13;
organisational variables (organisational leadership, organisational culture, professional &#13;
development and learner-centredness) among other factors. Previous studies have focused largely &#13;
on the interrelationship between student and teacher-related factors with little emphasis on how &#13;
school organisational variables predict education quality performance. This study was, therefore, &#13;
designed to explore how school organisational variables determine educational quality &#13;
performance in southwestern Nigeria. It also established the model fit, predictive accuracy and &#13;
predictive relevance of each variable to English Language Achievement (EACH) and &#13;
Mathematics Achievement (MACH) models.&#13;
Deming‘s Total Quality Management Theory guided the study, while the survey design of &#13;
correlational type was adopted. Simple random sampling was used to select three states: Lagos, &#13;
Oyo and Ondo from the Southwest, while the senatorial district where each state capital is &#13;
located was purposively selected. In each of the senatorial districts, three local government areas &#13;
(LGAs) were randomly selected, while six public and three private schools were chosen from &#13;
each LGA. In each school, a principal, two teachers (English and Mathematics teachers) and an &#13;
intact class of SS III students were sampled (principals-81, teachers-162 and students-3331). The &#13;
seven instruments used were: principal leadership practices questionnaire (r= 0.96), school &#13;
culture survey (r= 0.84), Teachers Professional Development Affinity Inventory (r= 0.92), &#13;
learner-centredness questionnaire for students in English Language (r= 0.97) students evaluation &#13;
of teacher effectiveness scale in English language (r= 0.96), and mathematics (r= 0.96). Students &#13;
non cognitive outcome scales (r= 0.86). Data were analysed by partial least square-structural &#13;
equation modelling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS at 0.05 level of significance.&#13;
Organisational leadership (r= 0.10; r= 0.15), organisational culture (r= 0.15; r= 0.16) professional &#13;
development (r= 0.14; r= 0.30), and learner-centredness (r= -0.22; r= -0.04) had significant &#13;
relationships with performance in English language and Mathematics respectively. The EACH &#13;
and MACH structural models indicated model fitness (SMRM = 0.06 and 0.05 respectively), &#13;
predictive accuracy (R2&#13;
= 0.30; 0.28, respectively) and predictive relevance Q &gt; 0 on &#13;
organisational leadership (MACH- Q&#13;
2 &gt; 0.046) organisational culture (Q2&#13;
&gt; 0.17 and 0.37 &#13;
respectively), professional development (Q2&#13;
&gt; 0.28 and 0.51 respectively) learner-centredness &#13;
(EACH- Q&#13;
2&#13;
&gt; 0.01), teacher effectiveness (Q2&#13;
&gt; 0.47 and 0.43, respectively) students non cognitive outcome (Q2&#13;
&gt; 0.24 and 0.21 respectively) English language and Mathematics (Q2&#13;
&gt; &#13;
0.12 and 0.15 respectively) had predictive relevance to the EACH and MACH models while &#13;
organisational leadership for EACH (Q2&#13;
&lt; -0.01) and learner-centredness for MACH (Q2&#13;
&lt; 0 -&#13;
0.08) had no predictive relevance to the models.&#13;
Organisational leadership, organisational culture, professional development and learner centredness are important in determining educational quality performance. School institutions &#13;
seeking quality participation in the provision of quality education should improve school &#13;
organisational variables to ensure quality performance.
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1570</guid>
<dc:date>2021-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
