<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2373">
<title>DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATED MEASURES FOR PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A GAS TURBINE POWER PLANT</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2373</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2374"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T05:28:10Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2374">
<title>DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATED MEASURES FOR PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A GAS TURBINE POWER PLANT</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2374</link>
<description>DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATED MEASURES FOR PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A GAS TURBINE POWER PLANT
BASSEY, Joseph Benedict
Performance analysis of gas turbine power plant is imperative for its optimal operations&#13;
and maintenance. Reliability, exergy efficiency and emission characteristics are&#13;
measures that have been used independently to assess its performance. However, this&#13;
independent assessment approach has not adequately expressed the actual state of the&#13;
plant performance. While other approaches are being explored, literature on Integrated&#13;
Assessment Approach (IAA) is sparse. This study therefore focused on development of&#13;
performance measures of IAA for the evaluation of gas turbine power plants.&#13;
Four-year (year-1, year-2, year-3 and year-4) available data of a 180 MW simple cycle&#13;
gas turbine power plant (Model No.:GT13E2) operating on dry low NOx technology&#13;
was obtained to determine the plant performance state. Performance parameters of&#13;
exergy destruction and exergy efficiency (at base loads of 80, 120 and 140 MW),&#13;
reliability and availability were analysed, yearly. Steady state exergy analysis equation&#13;
was used to evaluate the plant exergy destruction and exergy efficiency. System&#13;
adequacy technique was used to evaluate the plant reliability and availability. Two new&#13;
performance indexes (I and II) based on the IAA were developed and compared with the&#13;
independent measures in the assessment of the power plant. Exergy efficiency and&#13;
reliability were combined to formulate Index I, while exergy efficiency and availability&#13;
were combined to formulate Index II. The indexes ranges between zero and one&#13;
indicating the minimum and maximum points. Data were analysed using ANOVA at&#13;
α0.05.&#13;
Plant exergy destruction at 80, 120 and 140 MW base loads were 0.6640, 0.6290 and&#13;
0.5914; 0.6476, 0.6342 and 0.5855; 0.6295, 0.6342 and 0.5926; and 0.6523, 0.6285 and&#13;
0.6043 in year-1, year-2, year-3 and year-4, respectively. Exergy efficiencies at 80, 120&#13;
and 140 MW were 0.7195, 0.7916 and 0.8691; 0.7510, 0.7854 and 0.8775; 0.7808,&#13;
0.7774 and 0.8602; and 0.7389, 0.7875 and 0.8445 in year-1, year-2, year-3 and year-4,&#13;
respectively, indicating improvement as base load increased. Reliability and availability&#13;
were 0.8820 and 0.8168; 0.7959 and 0.6734; 0.7604 and 0.7497; and 0.6294 and 0.7238&#13;
for year-1, year-2, year-3 and year-4, respectively. At 80, 120 and 140 MW base loads,&#13;
Index I values were 0.8281, 0.8630 and 0.9289; 0.7919, 0.8098 and 0.9023; 0.7833,&#13;
0.7819 and 0.8822; and 0.6538, 0.6860 and 0.8197 in year-1, year-2, year-3 and year-4,&#13;
7&#13;
respectively. At 80, 120 and 140 MW, Index II values were 0.5877, 0.6466 and 0.7099;&#13;
0.5058, 0.5289 and 0.5909; 0.5854, 0.5828 and 0.6449; and 0.5345, 0.5700 and 0.6113&#13;
in year-1, year-2, year-3 and year-4, respectively. Index I exhibited higher sensitivity by&#13;
mimicking the combined behaviour of reliability and exergy efficiency. The best plant&#13;
state was achieved in year-1 at 140 MW base load. Index II also indicated that the plant&#13;
performed better in year-1 at 140 MW base load compared to other years. The integrated&#13;
measures had similar trend with the independent measures but were significantly&#13;
different.&#13;
The integrated assessment measures were found suitable in the assessment of gas turbine&#13;
power plant as they gave a better expression of the actual plant performance state.
</description>
<dc:date>2021-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
