<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1821">
<title>(IM)POLITENESS IN THE INTERACTIONS OF SELECTED NIGERIAN NEWS-BASED VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1821</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1822"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T18:12:40Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1822">
<title>(IM)POLITENESS IN THE INTERACTIONS OF SELECTED NIGERIAN NEWS-BASED VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1822</link>
<description>(IM)POLITENESS IN THE INTERACTIONS OF SELECTED NIGERIAN NEWS-BASED VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES
OYADIJI, EBENEZER OLUSHOLA
Virtual communities have become the largest and most diverse domains since the turn of&#13;
the century where language plays a dominant role. Studies on communities in the&#13;
Nigerian cyberspace have concentrated on discourse structure and general language use&#13;
than on politeness and its connection to online news reportage. This study was, therefore,&#13;
designed to examine (im) politeness behaviour of participants in Nigerian news-based&#13;
virtual communities, with a view to determining how participants negotiate and process&#13;
(im)politeness, as well as how the cultural heterogeneity of the Nigerian society impacts&#13;
on (im)politeness behaviour.&#13;
Tae-Seop Lim and John Bower’s model of Face alongside Miriam Locher and Richard&#13;
Watt’s Relational Work were adopted as the framework, while the interpretive design was&#13;
used. The Sahara Reporters, Yabaleftonline and Biafra TV, representing Internet-based&#13;
online news, and the online versions of Leadership and The Nation, based on&#13;
conventional newspapers were purposively selected for their non-censorship of&#13;
participants’ behaviour and representation of different political ideologies. Twenty-five&#13;
threads of comments on the online news posts were collected through participatory&#13;
observation between 2014 and 2018. Data were subjected to pragmatic analysis.&#13;
Participants engaged in a multi-directional pattern of interaction with news characters,&#13;
writers and co-interactants perceived as interactants in the community and engaged&#13;
directly in negotiating (im)politeness. Observed tools of politeness, including ‘likes’,&#13;
graphemes and fellowship/competence face observance, were often the same for&#13;
impoliteness since their interpretations rely mostly on emotions linked inextricably to&#13;
each interactant’s side of the argument. The expression of both politeness and&#13;
impoliteness were multimodal. Impoliteness, however, exploited more memes, GIFs,&#13;
pictures and emojis, while polite expressions were mostly verbal but for the use of&#13;
‘approval smileys’ and ‘likes’. Face observance strategies most frequently used included&#13;
‘agreement’, ‘praise of opinion’ and use of indigenous expressions and sociolects. These,&#13;
in turn, served to express face threats to opponents who are also excluded from the&#13;
linguistic manoeuvrings. Although politeness in the virtual communities proceeded from&#13;
the need to maintain rapport and enhance communication, impoliteness is often a tool to&#13;
generate responses. The perceived truth-value of online news items and other aspects of&#13;
contextual configuration constantly swayed the choice of politeness behaviour.&#13;
Homogenous Biafra TV. community generated the most frequent use of agreement. Less&#13;
serious news in Yabaleftonline generated more politic banter, while serious news&#13;
generated unfriendly conversations in virtual communities of the Sahara Reporters,&#13;
Leadership and The Nation, especially when such news is perceived as untrue or&#13;
culturally biased. When netizens found themselves in communicative situations involving&#13;
argument across ethno-social or geopolitical divides, impoliteness, via trolls, was used as&#13;
a polarity antenna and tool to sustain conversation, while otherness and distance were&#13;
enacted as basis for impolite behaviour. Impolite behaviour was sustained as long as&#13;
posters enjoyed support. Politeness does not necessarily sustain conversation, compared&#13;
to face-to-face interactions.&#13;
(Im) politeness behaviour in Nigerian news-based virtual communities reflects diverse&#13;
attitudes to news reportage, which, in turn, points at the polarised nature of the Nigerian&#13;
society. Participants’ concern for face is lessened by the anonymity/impersonality that&#13;
characterises conversations in virtual communities.
</description>
<dc:date>2022-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
