<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>A COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE SEMIOTICS OF ORIN KETE AND ORIN AGBÈ AMONG THE ÌBÀRÀPÁ AND ÒKÈ-ÒGÙN PEOPLE OF YORÙBÁ, NIGERIA</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1938" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1938</id>
<updated>2026-04-15T14:18:15Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T14:18:15Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>A COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE SEMIOTICS OF ORIN KETE AND ORIN AGBÈ AMONG THE ÌBÀRÀPÁ AND ÒKÈ-ÒGÙN PEOPLE OF YORÙBÁ, NIGERIA</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1939" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>KÍARÍBẸ̀ Ẹ, LUQMAN ABÍSỌ́ lÁ</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1939</id>
<updated>2024-04-24T14:19:01Z</updated>
<published>2023-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE SEMIOTICS OF ORIN KETE AND ORIN AGBÈ AMONG THE ÌBÀRÀPÁ AND ÒKÈ-ÒGÙN PEOPLE OF YORÙBÁ, NIGERIA
KÍARÍBẸ̀ Ẹ, LUQMAN ABÍSỌ́ lÁ
Orin kete and Orin agbè are Yorùbá oral poetic forms predominantly performed among the&#13;
Ìbàràpá and Òkè-Ògùn people of Ọ̀ yọ́ State, South-West Nigeria. Previous studies on Yorùbá&#13;
oral poetry have focused largely on poetic types, such as, ẹ̀ ṣà and ìjálá; with little attention&#13;
devoted to Orin agbè and Orin kete. This study was, therefore, designed to investigate the&#13;
comparative performance semiotic features of Orin kete and Orin agbè, with a view to&#13;
establishing their socio-cultural relevance and factors responsible for their sustainability.&#13;
Yuri Lotman’s Cultural Semiotics, complemented by Richard Schechner’s Performance&#13;
Theory and Steven Totosy de Zepetnek’s Comparative Approach, was adopted as the&#13;
framework. The ethnographic design was employed. Five performances of Orin kete and&#13;
three performances of Orin agbè were collected from Igbó Ọrà in Ìbàràpá; while one&#13;
performance of Orin agbè was collected from each of Ìmia and Ilùà in Òkè-Ògùn. These&#13;
communities are where the performance of the genres are active. Audio-visual data were&#13;
recorded during the performances. Key informant interviews were conducted with four&#13;
respondents, purposively selected for being leaders in each of the performance groups. A&#13;
thirty-item questionnaire on the relevance and sustainability of Orin kete and Orin agbè, were&#13;
administered to 100 respondents, 51 members and 49 non-members of the performance&#13;
groups. The data were subjected to literary and descriptive analyses.&#13;
Both genres feature in secular performance contexts but Orin kete is primarily performed in&#13;
religious contexts. The two genres maintain a tripartite performance structure of prelude,&#13;
body and finale. The prelude sub-divided into ìsèlù, ìbà, ìwúre and ìfira-ẹni-hàn. Ìsèlù is,&#13;
however, not realised in Orin kete. Both genres are not gender-selective, as both attract female&#13;
and male performers as vocalists, instrumentalists and dancers. Male youthful acrobats are,&#13;
however, found only in Orin agbè performances. The costumes are either formal or informal.&#13;
Formal white constumes are used in Orin kete strictly during religious performances, while&#13;
in Orin agbè, a special uniform is worn for formal occassions. Musical instruments in Orin&#13;
kete consist of membranophones and idiophones, while only idiophones are found in Orin&#13;
agbè. Ìlù/agbè jíjá, ìdọ̀bálẹ̀ /ìyíkàá, yọpáyọsẹ̀ /ẹlẹ́ yọẹ̀ yọ, shoulder twisting and dancing, while&#13;
playing musical instruments are dance styles observed in both genres. However, while open&#13;
and close dance style is peculiar to Orin kete, fiwájújó-fẹ̀ yìnjó is restricted to Orin agbè.&#13;
Olóbìírípobírí, lifting with brooms, lifting with leaves and àlòṣílò are prominent acrobatic&#13;
displays in Orin agbè. The poetic exploration of qualisign, sinsign, legisign, index, symbol,&#13;
dicent and nonsensical codes are employed in the signification of poetic harmony, dance&#13;
skills, ọmọlúàbí attributes and women’s rights in both genres. Orin kete performs socioreligious functions, while Orin agbè performs only social functions. Both genres are deployed&#13;
for curbing societal anomalies. Religious status (80%), family sense of belonging (72%) and&#13;
kinship affiliation (72%) were identified as factors responsible for the sustainability of both&#13;
genres.&#13;
Among the Ibarapa and Oke ogun people, the performance semiotic features of Orin kete are&#13;
socio-religious, while those of Orin agbè are basically socially oriented.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
