<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Industrial and Production Engineering</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/124" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/124</id>
<updated>2026-04-15T15:50:08Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T15:50:08Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>DEVELOPMENT OF PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR SYNERGISTIC IMPACT OF AGE, PERIOD OF EXPOSURE AND NOISE LEVEL IN QUARRIES ON HEARING THRESHOLD OF WORKERS</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2183" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>ORIOLOWO, Kolawole Taofik</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2183</id>
<updated>2024-04-26T14:41:20Z</updated>
<published>2023-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">DEVELOPMENT OF PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR SYNERGISTIC IMPACT OF AGE, PERIOD OF EXPOSURE AND NOISE LEVEL IN QUARRIES ON HEARING THRESHOLD OF WORKERS
ORIOLOWO, Kolawole Taofik
Despite the importance of quarry operations to the construction industry in developing&#13;
countries, the excessive occupational noise involved in quarry operations is a threat to the&#13;
health of workers. Studies have shown that the age and years of work exposure (YE) are&#13;
two of the major factors that contribute to auditory health problems among the quarry&#13;
workers. Information on the effect of noise and related susceptibility factors on hearing&#13;
damage among Nigerian quarry workers are sparse. This study was conducted to develop&#13;
suitable models in order to investigate the synergistic influence of age, YE and Noise&#13;
Level (NL) in quarries on the Hearing Threshold (HT) of workers.&#13;
Questionnaires were administered to 204 quarry workers, who were randomly selected in&#13;
the year 2018 from four different quarry sites in southwestern Nigeria, to obtain the age&#13;
and YE. A follow up study was conducted on 185 of them in 2019. The NL at the quarry&#13;
sites during the working hours were measured using a digital sound level meter, while an&#13;
audiogram measured the HT at eight different frequencies (0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, 3.00,&#13;
4.00, 6.00 and 8.00kHz). Using ANOVA, eight regression models were developed and&#13;
validated to predict both the effects of age, YE and NL on HT, and the safe HT. These&#13;
were used to test for both the similarity of the NL conditions in the sites and the predictive&#13;
significance of the regression model terms. The predictive accuracies of the developed&#13;
models were evaluated using the predicted R2, while paired sample t-test and correlation&#13;
statistics were used to ascertain the impact of the workers’ continual exposure to noise&#13;
within the study period. Analyses were done using t-test at α0.05.&#13;
The percentage distribution of their age range in years were 9.7% (15-30), 50.8% (31-45),&#13;
38.4% (46-60), and 1.1% (60+). The mean age and YE were 42±9.01 and 18±7.03 years,&#13;
respectively. The NL were in the range of 87.30-116.98dB as against the permissible&#13;
exposure level of 85.00dB. The NL conditions on the sites were not significantly different&#13;
(101.61±0.38, 99.28±0.51, 100.51±1.01, 99.28±0.10). The Mean HT of the workers was&#13;
45.60±1.24dB and 75.0% of them had HT higher than the safe HT of ≤30.00dB. The age&#13;
predicted the workers’ HT at all frequencies considered. The YE significantly predicted&#13;
the HT at 1.00, 2.00, and 4.00 kHz, while NL significantly predicted the HT at 0.25 and&#13;
0.50 kHz. The models’ predicted R2 range was 0.71 – 0.82. The safe HT was predicted&#13;
with age ≤52 years and YE ≤32 years. The validation results were in agreement with the&#13;
data obtained during the experiment. The correlation and paired sample ranges were 0.17-&#13;
0.79 and 6.50-26.7, respectively, which showed that the workers' HT continuously&#13;
depreciated within the study period.&#13;
The developed models established that the synergistic factors of age, years of exposure&#13;
and noise level influenced the hearing threshold of quarry workers. Thus, the models can&#13;
be used for making decision in achieving workers’ safe operations in quarry industry.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>DEVELOPMENT OF A LIFE CYCLE COSTING MODEL FOR LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION SYSTEM</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2181" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>CHARLES, Ebitei</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2181</id>
<updated>2024-04-26T14:36:23Z</updated>
<published>2023-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">DEVELOPMENT OF A LIFE CYCLE COSTING MODEL FOR LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION SYSTEM
CHARLES, Ebitei
Despite the large natural gas reserve in Nigeria and increasing global demand for Liquefied Natural&#13;
Gas (LNG), prospective investors appear hesitant in doing LNG business in Nigeria. One major&#13;
reason is that the existing LNG business cost estimation models are inadequate to incorporate&#13;
various business factors such as long life-span risky events and capital intensiveness. A Life Cycle&#13;
Costing (LCC) model was developed to accommodate these factors using System Dynamics (SD)&#13;
principles.&#13;
Ten LNG business firms operating in Nigeria and abroad were studied and seven randomly selected&#13;
stakeholders interviewed for insights on LNG business processes. Operating sectors were identified&#13;
using SD principles. Input and output sector quantities and their inter-relationships were determined&#13;
using system causal loop, while flow diagramming approach was used to characterise the LNG value&#13;
chain operations. The LNG-process equations were formulated in terms of plant availability,&#13;
production workforce capability and shipment delivery rate. These were synthesised to evolve an&#13;
SD-LNG-LCC model. The model was applied to predict a set of twenty-one year (1999-2019) values&#13;
of LNG volume shipped and revenue. These were compared to the actual values obtained from an&#13;
LNG-firm in West Africa. The firm’s LCC, Unit Production Cost (UPC), Return on Investment&#13;
(ROI), Net Present Value (NPV) and Profitability Index (PI) were also obtained. The viability of&#13;
the firm’s Greenfield-Brownfield investments and the model’s performance were further evaluated&#13;
using different scenarios of NG base-prices. Data were analysed using student t-test at α0.05.&#13;
The identified operating sectors were production, maintenance and finance. Capital and operating&#13;
expenditures; NG-LNG prices; Train-Capacity; equipment and spares; planned manpower;&#13;
maintenance-effectiveness; discount-rate, and equipment-failure probabilities were identified sector&#13;
input quantities, while LCC, production volume, revenue, return on investment, payback period,&#13;
discounted profit, equipment availability were the outputs. Plant availability, production workforce&#13;
capability and shipment delivery rate were 0.90, 2310.92 m3gas/man-hour and 6 deliveries/shipyear,&#13;
respectively. The model predicted LNG volume shipped was (13.46±0.02)×109 tonne per annum&#13;
(TPA) while the firm’s actual value was (13.62±0.02)×109 TPA. Similarly, the revenue from the&#13;
predicted and actual were (₦864.00±572.43)×109 [($5.40±3.58)×109] and (₦870.40±561.14)×109&#13;
[($5.44±3.51)×109]. These indicated that there was no significant difference between the predicted&#13;
and actual values. The firm’s LCC, UPC, ROI, NPV and PI were ₦10000.00×109 ($62.50×109),&#13;
₦662.40 ($4.14) per MMBTU, 26.01%, ₦2369.60×109 ($14.81×109) and 1.59, respectively. For&#13;
expansion alternatives, the Greenfield LCC was ₦109264.60 [$682.91] per tonneyear relative to the&#13;
Brownfield’s ₦76235.20 ($476.47) per tonneyear. In model sensitivity, 50% increase in NG baseprice yielded LCC of ₦7359.80×109 ($45.98×109) compared to ₦12640.20×109 ($79.02)×109 yield&#13;
by a 150% increase.&#13;
A liquefied natural gas life cycle costing model was developed using system dynamics principles.&#13;
The developed model is a useful instrument for determining costs and decision support for liquefied&#13;
natural gas project investments.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>DEVELOPMENT OF HEURISTICS FOR SINGLE PROCESSOR SCHEDULING PROBLEMS WITH TARDINESS - RELATED PERFORMANCE MEASURES</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/310" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>AKANDE, SAHEED</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/310</id>
<updated>2019-03-22T09:00:09Z</updated>
<published>2017-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">DEVELOPMENT OF HEURISTICS FOR SINGLE PROCESSOR SCHEDULING PROBLEMS WITH TARDINESS - RELATED PERFORMANCE MEASURES
AKANDE, SAHEED
Scheduling problems involve the processing of jobs on processor(s) subject to constraints to optimise performance measures. Determining schedules that minimise tardiness-related performance measures for single processor scheduling problems is complex. Optimal-solutions require prohibitive-time, therefore heuristics are explored in real-life but effectiveness of existing heuristics is inadequate. The objective of this study was to develop effective heuristics for minimizing tardiness-related performance measures for single processor scheduling problems.&#13;
&#13;
Six heuristics were developed and compared to the existing heuristics for minimizing the Total-Tardiness of jobs with Release-Dates (2TRD), Total-Tardiness and Total-Flowtime of jobs with Zero-Release-Dates (3TFZRD) and Total-Tardiness and Total-Flowtime of jobs with Release-Dates (3TFRD). HeuristicI (HeuI) and HeuristicII (HeuII) developed for 2TRD problem were compared to Dynamic Modified Due Date (DMDD). For 3TFZRD problem, heuristicIII (HeuIII) and heuristicIV (HeuIV) developed were compared to heuristicA (HeuA). Generalised Algorithm (GAlg) was compared to heuristicV (HeuV) and heuristicVI (HeuVI) developed for 3TFRD. HeuI and HeuII schedule jobs to reduce lateness. HeuIII and HeuIV reduce waiting-time. HeuV and HeuIV reduce idle-time and waiting-time. Fifty instances each, for problem-sizes (n) from small-sized (5≤n≤10), medium-sized (10&lt;n&lt;30), and large-sized (30≤n≤1000) randomly generated and industry-based problems involving 5, 10 and 15 jobs were solved in editor module in MATLAB environment. The Branch and Bound (BB) optimal method was used to solve small-and medium-sized problems. For 3TFZRD and 3TFRD problems, a composite-function was formulated and normalised. The Approximation Ratio (AR) test evaluated the heuristics’ effectiveness, significant differences were analysed using t-test at α_0.05.&#13;
&#13;
The small-sized problems objective-function were: BB (9.26±9.12), HeuI (16.32±17.38), HeuII (12.03±10.02), DMDD (20.02±15.21) for 2TRD; BB (0.3059±0.0190), HeuIII (0.3059±0.0190), HeuIV (0.3192±0.0010), HeuA (0.3191±0.0200) for 3TFZRD; BB (0.1664±0.0043), HeuV (0.2350±0.0090), HeuVI (0.2096±0.0094), GAlg (0.3875±0.0380) for 3TFRD.  HeuII, HeuIII and HeuVI yielded the AR of 1.85±1.22, 1.00±0.00 and 1.26±0.09 compared to DMDD (4.42±4.33), HeuA (1.05±0.013) and GAlg (2.33±0.176), respectively. The medium-sized problems objective-function were: BB (287.11±138.54), HeuI (442.15±197.36), HeuII (432.48±137.86), DMDD (449.03±135.54) for 2TRD; BB (0.3397±0.0047), HeuIII (0.3398±0.0201), HeuIV (0.3403±0.0204), HeuA (0.3629±0.0239) for 3TFZRD; BB (0.2410±0.0550), HeuV (0.3395±0.0520), HeuVI (0.3275±0.0530), GAlg (0.6191±0.0440) for 3TFRD. Considering the small-and-medium-sized problems, HeuII and HeuIII were not significantly different from the optimal. The large-sized problems objective-function were: HeuI (254,046±8215), HeuII (311,184±11,643), DMDD (303,044±8642) for 2TRD; HeuIII (0.3492±0.0024), HeuIV (0.3493±0.0024), HeuA (0.3736 ±0.0029) for 3TFZRD; HeuV (0.5511±0.0670), HeuVI (0.5473±0.0690), GAlg (0.7589±0.0960) for 3TFRD. Therefore, regarding 2TRD problem, HeuII was recommended when solving small-and-medium-sized problems and HeuI for large-sized. Considering 3TFZRD and 3TFRD problems, HeuIII and HeuVI were respectively recommended for all the problem sizes. With respect to the industry-based problems, HeuII, HeuIII and HeuVI were (44.3±36.9%), (182.7±113.8%) and (39.0±25.4%), respectively better than firm policies; First-Come-First-Served for 2TRD and 3TFZRD, Shortest-Processing-Time for 3TFRD.&#13;
&#13;
The developed heuristics minimised tardiness-related performance measures for single processor scheduling problems and were more effective compared to the existing ones.  &#13;
 &#13;
Keywords: Single Processor Scheduling, Heuristic, Effectiveness, Total-Tardiness,  &#13;
                    Total-Flowtime
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
